First off, did you read the section titled, “Choosing Carefully: Why Investor-Agent Partnerships FAIL - The KEY Reasons"? If not, do yourself a favor. Read that. It'll answer this question. But from an analogy perspective, I'll also answer it. Ever seen the movie Blood Diamond with Leonardo DiCaprio? If you have, then you know what a diamond mine looks like. If not, that's ok, I'll describe it. It's a dirty, filthy, unpleasant PIT, filled with people, usually slaves or low-paid workers, forced to work long hours in grueling conditions, digging through hundreds of yards of dirt to find that needle in a haystack diamond. Once they find it, they're instructed to bring it to their master, the Mine-Boss, who profits the most from it. In our analogy here, Investors tend to think of themselves as the Mine Boss & view Agents (you) as their slaves & free labor to go hunt down their “diamonds,” I.e. suitable investment properties. And should you find one, which is rare, they say, “Good boy,” patting you on the head like you're their fucking mutt. Then say, “In 6 months, after it gets renovated, we'll give it back to you as a Listing" - making you a 2.5% commission. But, you must understand, this is them profiting OFF of you, not with you. Because, for them to profit, they first needed you to dig around in the dirt, like a slave, working long hours, to find that “needle in the haystack” investment property that met their investment criteria. Without that, without your “free labor,” they have no property to flip. This is why we AGREE - for 99% of agents, working with investors, it usually SUCKS. But we don't operate that way. We don't need ANY agent to find us investment properties. We have an In-house Marketing & Acquisitions Agency that does that work for us. For this partnership, we just want to refer the "Come List Me" Sellers to you, whose property doesn't meet our investment criteria. Too good to be true? We don't think so. It's just the way our model works & how it's different.